Eeep!

Jun. 15th, 2004 11:23 am
lnr: (books)
[personal profile] lnr
Now my friends and acquiantances are going round writing novels:

http://www.madnorwegian.com/fp/product.php?item=Bfp02otcots

[Poll #308046]

Date: 2004-06-15 10:37 am (UTC)
juliet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juliet
I've just got my copy through (signed, no less! cos I bought it off Phil), & am thoroughly enjoying it so far.

Date: 2004-06-15 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rillaith.livejournal.com
Oooooooh purty cover. I'd buy it on the strength of the font alone. Not that I'm a sucker for such things. Really, I'm not. It's an illusion. Mm hmm.

Date: 2004-06-15 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arkady.livejournal.com
What do you find so ridiculous about the name? Seems perfectly normal to me.

Date: 2004-06-15 11:56 am (UTC)
ext_22879: (Default)
From: [identity profile] nja.livejournal.com
It seems to be getting commoner, though. I've got friends who are married and while the parents have kept their own surnames, the kids use both surnames (though in this case with the man's surname first). Teacher friends tell me it's not unusual nowadays.

Date: 2004-06-15 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
I think it's cos I knew him when he was plain Phil Hallard

Ditto.

Actually I don't think I've seen him since he was an undergraduate (how long ago was that!). Certainly haven't met the Mrs.

Date: 2004-06-15 12:52 pm (UTC)
ext_44: (mobius-scarf)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
I definitely voted "no". Given the two people in the marriage (both of whom I respect, even though I was never more than cordial with either of them) and that they want a double-barrelled surname, it's one of the two logical picks.

However, Hallard-Purser trips off at least my tongue more easily than Purser-Hallard does. (Could this be because I've known a guy named Hanbury Hampden-Turner for years?) Perhaps there's convention in these things that the ladies' surname goes first and you don't get a choice in the matter.

Date: 2004-06-15 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rillaith.livejournal.com
Either that, or they want to be able to name kids such that they get pronounceable initials (ending in -PH, y'see)

Date: 2004-06-15 02:08 pm (UTC)
sparrowsion: (psychedelic)
From: [personal profile] sparrowsion
Hallard-Purser trips off at least my tongue more easily

Really? My tongue gets tripped up by the "dp" consonant cluster.

Date: 2004-06-15 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andyroyal.livejournal.com
After Skelton-Bodfish, all other names seem normal.

yebbut

Date: 2004-06-15 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbmurray.livejournal.com
As the owner (?) of a double-barrelled surname myself, I feel entitled to say I think they're a little problematic. Today, for instance, the post office had to search in a variety of places to find my non-delivered parcel. (Oh, and they still didn't find it, but that's another matter.)

Then there's what to do with the kids (if any). My sister, who retained her (double-barrelled) surname when she got married is now about to give birth, and there is much debate as to the moniker by which the future child will be known.

It does seem to me that the Spanish get this right: Firstname Motherssurname Fatherssurname.

Jon (Beasley-Murray)

Date: 2004-06-15 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infinitarian.livejournal.com
Hmm. It may be ridiculous, but at least it's distinctive. We know there's no-one else wandering around using it.

Thanks for the book plug, incidentally. Buy my novel, random people who used to know me once!

PPH

Date: 2004-06-21 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drcosmos.livejournal.com
In the world of double-barrelled surnames such as Chocqueel-Mangan and Goosnargh-Fishwhisk, Purser-Hallard is sensible and eminently acceptable.

you may be right

Date: 2004-06-22 09:09 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I must say I didn't realise before hand how cumbersome a double barrelled surname is. Its got to the point where if I'm ordering a pizza or taxi, or booking a restaurant or hair appointment, I just use one half or the other because its Just Too Complicated to spell the whole lot. I've also lost count of the times when people have assumed that my first name is Purser and my surname Hallard - I mean what kind of a forename is Purser for Pete's sake?

At the time, it was the least silly of a variety of pretty silly options. Phil wanted us to go for either an Anagram (Pullars-Harder was his favouite, or failing that something including Pulsar) or to pioneer the use of unusual punctuation within the name, such as Purser:Hallard or Purser!Hallard.

If I was in communication with my former self, I would advise some shorter combination of the two names, such as Purlard - it would probably feel strange for a bit, but would be more easily livable-with. On the other hand if I was in communication with my self of 5 years ago there are a hell of a lot of more important bits of advice I would give myself, so this tiny detail might get forgotten.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819 202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 05:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios