Book three in the Narnia chronicles mostly takes place outside Narnia. Again it's rather a good one, with some nice world-building in terms of the vaguely Eastern land of Calormen. Though illustrating the darker Calormen as cruel and owning slaves seems a little racist in modern eyes. Long-lost twins is always a bit of a cliche as plots go, but never mind, they're both nice lads. And Aravis is nice too. I love her bit hiding behing the sofa listening to the plotting of Prince Radabash. And I'm mildly amused by the line near the very end: "Aravis also had many quarrels (and, I'm afraid, even fights) with Cor, but they always made it up again: so that years later, when they were grown up, they were so used to quarrelling, and making it up again that they got married so as to go on doing it more conveniently." What a sad view on marriage! Obviously Richard and I should never bother, since we still haven't seemed to get the hang of falling our very much ;-) Anyway another book read quickly and with nostalgia and enjoyment, and looking forward to the rest.
Page Summary
ailbhe - (no subject)
mtbc100.livejournal.com - (no subject)
catyak - (no subject)
damerell.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lnr - (no subject)
vyvyan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rmc28 - (no subject)
hoiho.livejournal.com - (no subject)
simont - (no subject)
damerell.livejournal.com - (no subject)
teleute.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 02:44 pm (UTC)How's your little one doing?
--Susan
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 03:20 pm (UTC)Gah. I remember enjoying the Narnia books as a child before I realised what was going on. It's very frustrating.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 04:18 pm (UTC)I think my least successful long-term relationship was the one than involved no quarrels at all - because it also involved very little communication of any sort.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 02:19 am (UTC)Bad arguments are very unpleasant, but I rather feel the book is referring to the 'good argument' type - more a firm and frank exchange of views. As it happens, Tony and I haven't quite managed to fall out very much yet, but we do have plenty of time to practice ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 04:17 am (UTC)I imagine that's why he used the softer word quarrel, rather than argue. To me, anyway, quarrel seems to carry an implication of good nature, where argue suggests more overt hostility. But maybe that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 05:04 am (UTC)But maybe that's just me ;-)
(ObCarStereo!)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 10:26 pm (UTC)