Extract from recent letter from Sally, head of personnelish stuff for the dept:
As we discussed, the period of your current contract expires on 28 February 2005 and, because of your illness and in view of the modified work pattern we agreed with you to support your gradual return to full-time work, it has not been possible to carry out the normal assessment of your work and consider you for confirmation in your post. I am, therefore, arranging for the Appointments Committee to meet, hopefully in mid-December, to consider extending your initial period of appointment so that this assessment may be made at a later date when, as we hope, you will have returned to work on a full-time basis and be undertaking the full range of duties appropriate to the grade of your post
The committee want an up-to-date CV and two references, so Sally wants them by Monday. As a result I've been hacking on my CV.
Current version in progress: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~eleanorb/cv/cv.pdf
I'd apprciate any advice.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 07:46 pm (UTC)I hope so too, but will have to wait and see.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 08:43 pm (UTC)I agree that the clubbing doesn't add much.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 09:12 pm (UTC)I think you've got some punctuational inconsistencies in your lists of courses, but it may just be my dodgy monitor. I use semi-colons between courses, but that's partly because I have course titles with commas in ("Graphs, networks, and design"). OTOH it means the reader doesn't have to work out whether or not some of those commas are within course names rather than between them.
I'd say "GCSEs: 7 at grade A", and list them perhaps (you've got space) and forget the grade C. It's all a long time ago now. I routinely forget my History.
I think your computer officer duties sound increasingly impressive as you go down the list; I'd start at "Answering postmaster queries" and stick the bit that was at the beginning at the end.
IT assistant: s/is/was/ throughout.
Interests: Typo: particpated. 1992 was a long time ago, can you lose the date or say "when I was at Oxfrod" or summat.
Computing: do you have to say "minor" programming?
Looks good. These are all quibbles. YMMV.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 10:24 pm (UTC)It might be worth separating out the skills bit into a summary section at the beginning with emphasis on stuff relevant to the job (e.g. Perl scripting, Exim filters, UNIX etc.).
If there are any specific projects you've had a significant role in then it would be worth adding those into the current employment section.
If you've been on any work related training courses it would be worth adding a "Training" section to list these.
These are just my thoughts and as others have said a CV tends to be a matter of personal preference. Although it is usually sensible to target it at the likely audience (never having been involved with university appointments boards I can't comment on what sort of things they expect).
no subject
Date: 2004-11-29 12:21 am (UTC)Tactical Developer, Equity Derivatives
...or whatever that particular job happens to be. Then three lines listing the skills, and I really do suggest that this is composed with the job specification and the employers' known activities as a guide - not written for your own convenience in listing stuff.
Then comes Employment history (oo look, she's proved she can do this stuff elsewhere), then education (oh yes, we can tick the box 'graduate' and HR will wave it through).
On the other hand, this is for an academic institution. Maybe the academic part of the CV is the bit that they scan before deciding to bin it or put you on the shortlist.
And on the gripping hand, this isn't a job application at all: it's an administrative review that you'd do well investigate discreetly, so that you have some idea what it is that they actually want to hear.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-29 09:22 am (UTC)(S)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-29 09:46 am (UTC)I'd specifically not list them exactly for that latter reason. It was a long time ago. Just leave in the number.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-29 03:49 pm (UTC)I also notice that the postcode you list for Caroline Blackmun is reported to be invalid by royalmail.com, and that you only list the postcode for one of your employers.