Public houses in cities/ large towns are quite a different matter to small rural public houses though. Our small rural local has just about enough trade to keep it from shutting. The landlady smokes. Her staff smoke. About 85% of the people using the public bar smoke. There are two bars, so it would be easy enough to have a smoking one and a non-smoking one, but instead smoking will be entirely banned and some of the already dwinding clientele will stop going. In this particular case where is the justice and fairness for any of those people?
no subject